Review





Similar Products

c57bl 6 mice orient bio c57bl 6ncrlori c57bl 6 arsa dt  (ATCC)
99
ATCC c57bl 6 mice orient bio c57bl 6ncrlori c57bl 6 arsa dt
C57bl 6 Mice Orient Bio C57bl 6ncrlori C57bl 6 Arsa Dt, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/C57BL%2F6/pm42894537-454-203-198
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c57bl 6 mice orient bio c57bl 6ncrlori c57bl 6 arsa dt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
c57bl 6 female mice  (Inotiv)
99
Inotiv c57bl 6 female mice
C57bl 6 Female Mice, supplied by Inotiv, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/C57BL%2F6+Mouse/pm42870294-118-0-6
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c57bl 6 female mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice  (Envigo)
99
Envigo pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice
Pathogen Free C57bl 6j Olahsd Immune Competent Female Mice, supplied by Envigo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/C57BL%2F6+aged+inbred+mice/10__22203_slash_ecm__v033a11-101-1-8
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
c57bl 6 n virgin female mice  (Charles River Laboratories)
86
Charles River Laboratories c57bl 6 n virgin female mice
C57bl 6 N Virgin Female Mice, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/balb+c+mice/pmc12819348-47-1-9
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c57bl 6 n virgin female mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
male c57bl 6j mice  (Jackson Laboratory)
86
Jackson Laboratory male c57bl 6j mice
Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
Male C57bl 6j Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/6j+c57bl+male+mice/pmc12816905-34-0-8
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
male c57bl 6j mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
murine systemic infection diet induced obese dio c57bl 6 mice  (ATCC)
99
ATCC murine systemic infection diet induced obese dio c57bl 6 mice
Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
Murine Systemic Infection Diet Induced Obese Dio C57bl 6 Mice, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/Acinetobacter+baumannii+Bouvet+and+Grimont/pm42885922-340-6-23
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
murine systemic infection diet induced obese dio c57bl 6 mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
female c57bl6 j  (Inotiv)
99
Inotiv female c57bl6 j
Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
Female C57bl6 J, supplied by Inotiv, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/C57BL%2F6+Mouse/pm42881257-353-1-13
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
female c57bl6 j - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
icam 1 knockout ko c57bl 6j mice  (Cyagen Biosciences)
94
Cyagen Biosciences icam 1 knockout ko c57bl 6j mice
Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
Icam 1 Knockout Ko C57bl 6j Mice, supplied by Cyagen Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/Icam1/pm42879278-224-17-24
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
icam 1 knockout ko c57bl 6j mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
male c57bl 6 mice  (Inotiv)
99
Inotiv male c57bl 6 mice
Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
Male C57bl 6 Mice, supplied by Inotiv, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/C57BL%2F6+Mouse/pm42881217-94-2-8
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
male c57bl 6 mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
duoxa2 flox flox c57bl 6 background mice  (Cyagen Biosciences)
94
Cyagen Biosciences duoxa2 flox flox c57bl 6 background mice
Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
Duoxa2 Flox Flox C57bl 6 Background Mice, supplied by Cyagen Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/Duoxa2/pm42867942-258-1-9
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
duoxa2 flox flox c57bl 6 background mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) Male C57BL/6J mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.

Journal: Journal of Sport and Health Science

Article Title: Weightlifting outperforms voluntary wheel running for improving adiposity and insulin sensitivity in obese mice

doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101100

Figure Lengend Snippet: Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) Male C57BL/6J mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.

Article Snippet: Male C57BL/6J mice (8–10 weeks) were purchased from the Jackson Lab (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and housed in the animal care facility under 12-h light and dark cycle standard conditions.

Techniques: